"These [in Berea] were more fair-minded than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness, and searched the Scriptures daily to find out whether these things were so." - Acts 17:11
Light Mode
ShareShare this on FacebookPinterestWhatsAppEmailPrinter version

(14) And having called near all the multitude, he said to them, `Hearken to me, ye all, and understand; (15) there is nothing from without the man entering into him that is able to defile him, but the things coming out from him, those are the things defiling the man. (16) If any hath ears to hear -- let him hear.' (17) And when he entered into a house from the multitude, his disciples were questioning him about the simile, (18) and he saith to them, `So also ye are without understanding! Do ye not perceive that nothing from without entering into the man is able to defile him? (19) because it doth not enter into his heart, but into the belly, and into the drain it doth go out, purifying all the meats.' (20) And he said -- `That which is coming out from the man, that doth defile the man; (21) for from within, out of the heart of men, the evil reasonings do come forth, adulteries, whoredoms, murders, (22) thefts, covetous desires, wickedness, deceit, arrogance, an evil eye, evil speaking, pride, foolishness; (23) all these evils do come forth from within, and they defile the man.'


Mark 7:14-23 (and its parallel account in Matthew 15:1-20) is another set of scriptures that some believe state that nothing entering into a man can defile him, therefore eating whatever one wishes is perfectly all right. Can this be correct?

Those who believe this fail to understand the subject of the chapter, which is Jesus' denunciation of the Pharisees for their rejection of God's commandments in favor of their own traditions (verse 8). Verse 2 introduces the context: "Now when [the Pharisees] saw some of His disciples eat bread with defiled, that is, with unwashed hands, they found fault." The dispute was over ceremonial cleanliness - eating without first washing one's hands - which is not even an Old Testament law but a "tradition of the elders" (verse 5), which the Pharisees had themselves proclaimed authoritative.

In addition, beyond this fact, note that the kind of food the apostles were eating is "bread," not meat. Jesus' later comments speak generally of "foods" and "whatever enters the mouth," not specifically meat. Mark 7 is not about clean and unclean meats at all!

Verse 19 contains the phrase "thus purifying all foods," and many have jumped to the conclusion that Jesus declared all foods clean (as many marginal references state). The context, again - the very sentence in which it appears - proves this false: "Do you [disciples] not perceive that whatever enters a man from outside cannot defile him, because it does not enter his heart but his stomach, thus purifying all foods?"

First, "thus" is not in the Greek text but has been supplied by the translators. Without it, the sentence plainly states that the stomach "purifies" any kind of food put in it, not that Jesus had somehow declared all foods to be purified. Second, purified is the Greek word katharízoon, which means "to cleanse," "to purify," "to free from filth." In relation to the stomach's or the digestive tract's ability to "purify" food, the sense of katharízoon in this verse is "to purge of waste." This is brought out clearly in the parallel statement in Matthew 15:17: "Do you not yet understand that whatever enters the mouth goes into the stomach and is eliminated?"

Do these scriptures do away with the law concerning clean and unclean meats? Not at all!

— John O. Reid

To learn more, see:
Did God Change the Law of Clean and Unclean Meats?



 

Topics:

Ceremonial Cleanliness

Ceremonially Unclean

Clean/Unclean Animals

Clean/Unclean Laws

Clean/Unclean Meats

Cleansing

Defilement

Law "Done Away"

Purification

Spiritual Defilement

Tradition of Pharisees

Traditions of Men




Back to top